comparison · per 100 g
Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits vs Candies, butterscotch
Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits
Calories
517 kcal
Wins 4 of 6 Candies, butterscotch
Calories
391 kcal
Wins 2 of 6 | Nutrient | Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits | Candies, butterscotch |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (kcal) | 517 | 391 |
| Protein (g) | 4.44 | 0.03 |
| Fat (g) | 26.15 | 3.3 |
| Carbs (g) | 65.96 | 90.4 |
| Fiber (g) | 6.7 | 0 |
| Potassium (mg) | - | 3 |
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which has more calories: Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits or Candies, butterscotch? +
Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits: 517 kcal vs Candies, butterscotch: 391 kcal per 100g.
Which is higher in protein? +
Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits contains 4.44 g vs Candies, butterscotch with 0.03 g per 100g.
Which has more fiber? +
Baking Chocolate, Mars Snackfood US, M&M's Semisweet Chocolate Mini Baking Bits: 6.7 g vs Candies, butterscotch: 0 g of dietary fiber per 100g.
Which is better for weight loss? +
The lower-calorie option is Candies, butterscotch. Weight management depends on total diet, but lower-calorie, higher-fiber foods typically support satiety.
Which is more nutrient-dense? +
Nutrient density depends on calories per gram of protein, fiber, and micronutrients. Compare the full nutrient table above for specifics.