comparison · per 100 g
Amaranth Grain, Cooked vs Bulgur, cooked
Amaranth Grain, Cooked
Calories
102 kcal
Wins 5 of 6 Bulgur, cooked
Calories
83 kcal
Wins 1 of 6 | Nutrient | Amaranth Grain, Cooked | Bulgur, cooked |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (kcal) | 102 | 83 |
| Protein (g) | 3.8 | 3.08 |
| Fat (g) | 1.58 | 0.24 |
| Carbs (g) | 18.69 | 18.58 |
| Fiber (g) | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Potassium (mg) | 135 | 68 |
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which has more calories: Amaranth Grain, Cooked or Bulgur, cooked? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked: 102 kcal vs Bulgur, cooked: 83 kcal per 100g.
Which is higher in protein? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked contains 3.8 g vs Bulgur, cooked with 3.08 g per 100g.
Which has more fiber? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked: 2.1 g vs Bulgur, cooked: 4.5 g of dietary fiber per 100g.
Which is better for weight loss? +
The lower-calorie option is Bulgur, cooked. Weight management depends on total diet, but lower-calorie, higher-fiber foods typically support satiety.
Which is more nutrient-dense? +
Nutrient density depends on calories per gram of protein, fiber, and micronutrients. Compare the full nutrient table above for specifics.