comparison · per 100 g
Amaranth Grain, Cooked vs Buckwheat flour, whole-groat
Amaranth Grain, Cooked
Calories
102 kcal
Wins 0 of 6 Buckwheat flour, whole-groat
Calories
335 kcal
Wins 6 of 6 | Nutrient | Amaranth Grain, Cooked | Buckwheat flour, whole-groat |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (kcal) | 102 | 335 |
| Protein (g) | 3.8 | 12.62 |
| Fat (g) | 1.58 | 3.1 |
| Carbs (g) | 18.69 | 70.59 |
| Fiber (g) | 2.1 | 10 |
| Potassium (mg) | 135 | 577 |
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which has more calories: Amaranth Grain, Cooked or Buckwheat flour, whole-groat? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked: 102 kcal vs Buckwheat flour, whole-groat: 335 kcal per 100g.
Which is higher in protein? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked contains 3.8 g vs Buckwheat flour, whole-groat with 12.62 g per 100g.
Which has more fiber? +
Amaranth Grain, Cooked: 2.1 g vs Buckwheat flour, whole-groat: 10 g of dietary fiber per 100g.
Which is better for weight loss? +
The lower-calorie option is Amaranth Grain, Cooked. Weight management depends on total diet, but lower-calorie, higher-fiber foods typically support satiety.
Which is more nutrient-dense? +
Nutrient density depends on calories per gram of protein, fiber, and micronutrients. Compare the full nutrient table above for specifics.